Dear America,
It's not the issue whether Obama and Biden KNEW of the security decisions made by lower level bureaucrats prior to the attack in Libya on September 11, 2012 -- WELL IT IS, but it isn't -- but thanks anyway, Hillary.
Sure, there is the clear and present danger that it was indeed another anniversary of September 11th, and Libya could have been guarded better all the way around. There is that. And that's hindsight for you, right? That would be using our noggin, but nooooooo....
While the Bahamian Embassy probably wasn't necessarily the most critical hot spot to protect...just sayin'...and tried to find my backup for that statement, but can't find a thing on it anymore, like anywhere...so strange...
But no matter...this is where "the State Department" placed their priorities of budget and resources. Note: dating all the way back to April. Go Chevy Volts instead of keeping our diplomats safe and sound.
But for a president who says he gets INTELLIGENCE BRIEFINGS every single day -- or at least, reads them -- "the intelligence" under sworn testimony pointed to a TERRORIST attack within about 24 hours. I would think this point would have been mentioned, in writing even, in said INTELLIGENCE BRIEFINGS, don't ya think?
So -- you would think -- connecting all the dots now -- that the president's narrative would have been more measured on the whole video thing.... with more emphasis on the terrorist attack thing..... with his actions moving with stern diplomatic intention, accordingly. [and maybe even cancel a few campaign speeches in the immediate aftermath...]
IF the little lowly intelligence peons, the "security professionals," realized we were dealing with a terrorist attack, why the nonsense? Regardless --
In ANY EVENT, the president did not have to blame a stupid video for two weeks making him look like an idiot, then. He didn't have to go there. Remember now, he was still squawking about "the video" and tying it to the American deaths in Libya at the United Nations -- on September 25th!
Does this administration really think we are that stupid?
Does this administration really think the real intelligence isn't going to be brought to light, eventually?
The continuing evolution of this lie is simply ridiculous.
Okay -- so the administration IGNORED the threats and attacks in Libya leading up to the ambassador's death, along with three other Americans [FOR MONTHS we are told]. Is that news any better to hear? Hello, Mr. I read my Intelligence Briefings, like, everyday -- that's gotta be enough....
The nose grows.
Okay -- so Obama and Biden were not included in security briefings? They didn't know that there were issues apparently -- and that little tidbit is from the horse's mouth and according to the vice president right up front in the middle of a debate.
The nose grows.
Yet today, we find out from Hillary, that only low level "security professionals" were dealing with this sort of thing....If Bush/Cheney had even insinuated something to that effect, there would have been hell to pay -- would not every American be alarmed and outraged?
Okay -- so Hillary is taking full responsibility for outrageous security breaches and leaving the Libyan ambassador vulnerable to attacks? Really now? really? well then she should be asked to resign, right?
The nose grows.
Okay -- so considering the attacks in Libya were accomplished using our state-of-the-art weaponry -- is this just 'same verse same as the first' -- only bigger -- in tandem with another big mistake called "Fast & Furious"? Is that what they are about to fess up to, I mean, reveal? We gave the Libyan rebels weapons to fight the bad guys -- to become liberated and fan the Arab Spring -- and then we turn over the consulate guard to "Libyan insiders" [and who's idea was that?] -- and then -- lo and behold, they turn on us, using our state-of-the-art weaponry against us [including that which was handily given to them freely or simply taken right out from under our noses]?
The nose grows.
can you tell? g is a wee bit upset...I can't even stop to breathe right now.
wow.
so let's keep the good news coming..
The web was ablaze with stories immediately following the attack in Benghazi. Even as late as September 21st, "AllahPundit" from Hot Air made enormous leaps of intelligence connections. See here.
What does this do? It outlines proper CONTEXT -- albeit from someone outside the "security professional" domain -- but my goodness, this kind of "intelligence" at this point is simply everywhere. AND this is four days before Obama is speaking before the U.N.
Okay -- so Hillary is covering for Obama the day before the biggest night of his life. Co-in-kee-dink? I think not.
The nose grows.
But at the risk of beating a dead horse -- at what point would the president and vice president receive bonafide "intelligence briefings" outlining a need for concern? Where is that red line? What else were in the intelligence briefings that day? And when I say that day -- pick one -- 9/12, or 9/16 [the day UN Ambassador Susan Rice and other puppets were on TV], 9/21, 9/25.... 10/11...Has he read the one for today...yeah, yeah, that's a good question; what's it say for 10/16/12?
“There were six better stories." according to the NY Times -- and likewise, according to THIS administration. More to the point: a planned terrorist attack just didn't fit the narrative...
He's said it before -- and I'll say it again -- it's always about telling a better story to the American people.
As the nose grows...
The nose knows... we smell something that stinks to high heaven.
But no matter, new subject and more story.
Here's the opening paragraph on the official White House biography page on President George W. Bush:
And this just in -- no, wait, it's old news, but what does that matter, right? Anyway, it's just a post documenting the actions of our handsome, intelligent, super-smart and super-cute Editor-in-Chief
standing in as president.
oh...ya get it now?
The thing is, radicals make their own rules and make up stories all the time; it's what they do; it's all they know. Don't y'all know that by now?
Can't wait for tonight's debate.
Make it a Good Day, G
It's not the issue whether Obama and Biden KNEW of the security decisions made by lower level bureaucrats prior to the attack in Libya on September 11, 2012 -- WELL IT IS, but it isn't -- but thanks anyway, Hillary.
“I take responsibility...The president and the vice president wouldn’t be knowledgeable about specific decisions that are made by security professionals, [who are] the ones who weigh all of the threats and the risks and the needs and make a considered decision." thank you Daily Caller here.
Sure, there is the clear and present danger that it was indeed another anniversary of September 11th, and Libya could have been guarded better all the way around. There is that. And that's hindsight for you, right? That would be using our noggin, but nooooooo....
While the Bahamian Embassy probably wasn't necessarily the most critical hot spot to protect...just sayin'...and tried to find my backup for that statement, but can't find a thing on it anymore, like anywhere...so strange...
But no matter...this is where "the State Department" placed their priorities of budget and resources. Note: dating all the way back to April. Go Chevy Volts instead of keeping our diplomats safe and sound.
But for a president who says he gets INTELLIGENCE BRIEFINGS every single day -- or at least, reads them -- "the intelligence" under sworn testimony pointed to a TERRORIST attack within about 24 hours. I would think this point would have been mentioned, in writing even, in said INTELLIGENCE BRIEFINGS, don't ya think?
So -- you would think -- connecting all the dots now -- that the president's narrative would have been more measured on the whole video thing.... with more emphasis on the terrorist attack thing..... with his actions moving with stern diplomatic intention, accordingly. [and maybe even cancel a few campaign speeches in the immediate aftermath...]
IF the little lowly intelligence peons, the "security professionals," realized we were dealing with a terrorist attack, why the nonsense? Regardless --
"In a briefing to Capitol Hill staffers delivered the day after the deadly Sept. 11 attack in Benghazi, a top aide to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said the killings appeared to be the result of a terrorist attack.You know that thing that happens when you tell a lie...and you have to keep telling a lie, perhaps pose an even bigger lie, and a bigger lie --
Under Secretary of State for Management Patrick F. Kennedy -- who exercises responsibility for all department personnel, facilities, and operations, and who is one of the department's most respected civil servants, having served in his position under both the George W. Bush and Obama administrations -- delivered the assessment in an unclassified, half-hour conference call with staff aides to House and Senate lawmakers from relevant committees, and leadership offices, on the evening of Sept. 12. Capitol Hill sources described the call to Fox News."
"Fox News and other news organizations have previously reported that earlier on Sept. 12 -- within 24 hours of learning about the murders -- the Obama administration made a secret determination that Benghazi was indeed a terrorist attack. Doing so enabled them, under the terms of a 2001 anti-terrorism statute, to move men, money and materiel around more freely, and position these assets to meet the threats in Libya and other parts of the Mideast that had recently seen attacks on U.S. installations. Kennedy's assessment accorded with that determination."
In ANY EVENT, the president did not have to blame a stupid video for two weeks making him look like an idiot, then. He didn't have to go there. Remember now, he was still squawking about "the video" and tying it to the American deaths in Libya at the United Nations -- on September 25th!
Does this administration really think we are that stupid?
Does this administration really think the real intelligence isn't going to be brought to light, eventually?
The continuing evolution of this lie is simply ridiculous.
Okay -- so the administration IGNORED the threats and attacks in Libya leading up to the ambassador's death, along with three other Americans [FOR MONTHS we are told]. Is that news any better to hear? Hello, Mr. I read my Intelligence Briefings, like, everyday -- that's gotta be enough....
The nose grows.
Okay -- so Obama and Biden were not included in security briefings? They didn't know that there were issues apparently -- and that little tidbit is from the horse's mouth and according to the vice president right up front in the middle of a debate.
The nose grows.
Yet today, we find out from Hillary, that only low level "security professionals" were dealing with this sort of thing....If Bush/Cheney had even insinuated something to that effect, there would have been hell to pay -- would not every American be alarmed and outraged?
Okay -- so Hillary is taking full responsibility for outrageous security breaches and leaving the Libyan ambassador vulnerable to attacks? Really now? really? well then she should be asked to resign, right?
The nose grows.
Okay -- so considering the attacks in Libya were accomplished using our state-of-the-art weaponry -- is this just 'same verse same as the first' -- only bigger -- in tandem with another big mistake called "Fast & Furious"? Is that what they are about to fess up to, I mean, reveal? We gave the Libyan rebels weapons to fight the bad guys -- to become liberated and fan the Arab Spring -- and then we turn over the consulate guard to "Libyan insiders" [and who's idea was that?] -- and then -- lo and behold, they turn on us, using our state-of-the-art weaponry against us [including that which was handily given to them freely or simply taken right out from under our noses]?
The nose grows.
can you tell? g is a wee bit upset...I can't even stop to breathe right now.
wow.
so let's keep the good news coming..
The web was ablaze with stories immediately following the attack in Benghazi. Even as late as September 21st, "AllahPundit" from Hot Air made enormous leaps of intelligence connections. See here.
What does this do? It outlines proper CONTEXT -- albeit from someone outside the "security professional" domain -- but my goodness, this kind of "intelligence" at this point is simply everywhere. AND this is four days before Obama is speaking before the U.N.
Okay -- so Hillary is covering for Obama the day before the biggest night of his life. Co-in-kee-dink? I think not.
The nose grows.
But at the risk of beating a dead horse -- at what point would the president and vice president receive bonafide "intelligence briefings" outlining a need for concern? Where is that red line? What else were in the intelligence briefings that day? And when I say that day -- pick one -- 9/12, or 9/16 [the day UN Ambassador Susan Rice and other puppets were on TV], 9/21, 9/25.... 10/11...Has he read the one for today...yeah, yeah, that's a good question; what's it say for 10/16/12?
“There were six better stories." according to the NY Times -- and likewise, according to THIS administration. More to the point: a planned terrorist attack just didn't fit the narrative...
He's said it before -- and I'll say it again -- it's always about telling a better story to the American people.
As the nose grows...
The nose knows... we smell something that stinks to high heaven.
But no matter, new subject and more story.
Here's the opening paragraph on the official White House biography page on President George W. Bush:
"The airborne terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and the thwarted flight against the White House of Capitol on September 11, 2001, in which nearly 3,000 Americans were killed, transformed George W. Bush into a wartime president. The attacks put on hold many of Bush’s hopes and plans, and Bush’s father, George Bush, the 41st president, declared that his son “faced the greatest challenge of any president since Abraham Lincoln.”Now here's Obama's opening paragraph:
"Barack H. Obama is the 44th President of the United States.You have got to be kidding me -- "values from the heartland, a middle-class upbringing in a strong family, hard work and education as the means of getting ahead, and the conviction that a life so blessed should be lived in service to others." Wouldn't it be more like a broken family, living on an island -- and if not there, Indonesia, on foreign turf? But sure... having rather angelically transcended a seemingly conflicted childhood:
His story is the American story — values from the heartland, a middle-class upbringing in a strong family, hard work and education as the means of getting ahead, and the conviction that a life so blessed should be lived in service to others."
- being of mixed race (hating his whiteness),
- being of mixed religion (having Christian, Black Liberation, and Muslim influences),
- being of mixed ideology (wanting to believe in self-reliance, and yet betrothed to wealth re-distribution),
- being raised by grandparents, as all three of his parents failed him miserably.
And this just in -- no, wait, it's old news, but what does that matter, right? Anyway, it's just a post documenting the actions of our handsome, intelligent, super-smart and super-cute Editor-in-Chief
standing in as president.
oh...ya get it now?
The thing is, radicals make their own rules and make up stories all the time; it's what they do; it's all they know. Don't y'all know that by now?
Can't wait for tonight's debate.
Make it a Good Day, G
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment